Just gone from RAMAIR foam to K&N pods...
Moderators: trixynut, Mincehead, dicky, phuk72, Jak, Kevtrx849
- Killerwhale
- Site Sponsor
- Posts: 3797
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:41 am
- Location: GBG/Sweden
- Contact:
Just gone from RAMAIR foam to K&N pods...
Damn i can tell you it started to run fat as hell, smelt gas really bad....and today it was below zero.
So i guess we can conclude that the ramair breaths easier, will report where i end up after rejet.
So i guess we can conclude that the ramair breaths easier, will report where i end up after rejet.
- Killerwhale
- Site Sponsor
- Posts: 3797
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:41 am
- Location: GBG/Sweden
- Contact:
I run 170 with the foam and that was kinda spot on.phuk72 wrote:I have to say that really surprises me. IIRC your main jets were up about 175 weren't they?
Keep us posted
Now i really felt the petrol stink, would be interesting to put it on the dyno but i have a crapload of stuff todo before the season starts!
- Killerwhale
- Site Sponsor
- Posts: 3797
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:41 am
- Location: GBG/Sweden
- Contact:
- phuk72
- Site Sponsor / Administrator
- Posts: 3522
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 1:47 pm
- steve speed
- Site Sponsor
- Posts: 1780
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 9:11 pm
- Location: rochdale England
-
cheesie
- Site Sponsor
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:42 pm
- Location: N.ireland
this was tested on a carb not sure what type I will dig out the book if you want, the shape of the filter had a lot to do with what give the best the cfm too, there is a chart on the page giving exact numbers going from standard airbox with one snorkel snorkel cut down two snorkels no filter at all foam filter and a K&N pod type filter
-
cheesie
- Site Sponsor
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:42 pm
- Location: N.ireland
- phuk72
- Site Sponsor / Administrator
- Posts: 3522
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 1:47 pm
that is standrad thinking for CV carbs (as are standard on the TRX)cheesie wrote:this was tested on a carb not sure what type I will dig out the book if you want, the shape of the filter had a lot to do with what give the best the cfm too, there is a chart on the page giving exact numbers going from standard airbox with one snorkel snorkel cut down two snorkels no filter at all foam filter and a K&N pod type filter
although many people drill holes in the airbox or remove the snorkel, this has to be done carefully or you will feck up the mixture (which is why some people who have randomly drilled holes experience poor running in high winds)

- phuk72
- Site Sponsor / Administrator
- Posts: 3522
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 1:47 pm
A bit different with a four pot but interesting all the same (IIRC XJRs have fairly restrictive airboxes as well and respond well to free flowing pipescheesie wrote:I put seperate K&Ns on the xjr and it lifted power almost 5 bhp once it was jetted correctlyphuk72 wrote:KW and i were intially talking about FCRs.
I have heard that CVs respond well to pod filters and no airbox but I am sceptical given the need to supply still air to CVs

