oversprung rear?

Moderators: trixynut, Mincehead, dicky, phuk72, Jak, Kevtrx849

greyfear
TRX-Enthusiast
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:28 am

oversprung rear?

Post by greyfear » Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:44 am

Hi there this may seem a bit of an odd request as your all here modding trx's butt

I ride a 95 fzr 4jh customed and tweaked to high hell
2 months ago I literally snapped my rear shock in half and as the 4jh model might as well be non existent here in the uk ive opted for a trx rear shock now that ive finally got my greasy mitts on one.

Its the same dimensions as my fzr stock rear shock apart from the top mount which ive custom fabricated
So bar the settings which are obviously the fact its gassed and oiled for a trx. Its a straight swap

Upon riding it though the spring does feel very very stiff
As in it soaks up the sharp bumps fine but I can't seem to physically bounce the rear and I get no sag from grabbing the throttle
Is the stock spring oversprung on the trx when stock?
If it is then I'm going to build a custom linkage and lose all the preload

I just thought id be better off asking the opinion of the trx community on this subject :-)

In case youd like the information my bike is 190kg wet and I'm another 95kg on top
The shock ive got is from a 96 trx850 it supposedly only done 15000 miles but its absolutely mint all the paintwork is intact with no rust anywhere only a little road grime which was cleaned off the bottom mount

Any help would be most appreciated
-James

cobbadiggabuddyblooo
Site Sponsor
Posts: 6809
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:19 am
Location: Brisbane,Australia

Re: oversprung rear?

Post by cobbadiggabuddyblooo » Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:26 am

the std TRX spring rate is suited for a 76kg rider but the weight of a TRX is around the 207kg mark std..
laughter is the best medicine

greyfear
TRX-Enthusiast
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:28 am

Re: oversprung rear?

Post by greyfear » Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:34 am

Hm so I should be expecting a less static sag which I thought would be the case anyway

So my question still stands as does a stock trx feel oversprung on the rear?
Do the majority of trx riders end up using the stock with a lower preload?

I would bump mine down but itd mess my geometry right up on the fzr as the rest of the bikes still got its 18 months of adjustments on it that rely on the high preload to keep the height balance and id rather not go backwards with those to try and go forwards

User avatar
fung
Site Sponsor
Posts: 1604
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 2:00 am
Location: Gold Coast. South East Queensland.

Re: oversprung rear?

Post by fung » Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:39 am

howdy mate :)
perhaps check the shocks compression and rebound damping is not wound up full :wink:
then maybe soften both ends to keep your balance 8)
what tyre pressures are you running ??
cheers
fung
:rr:
I WOULD RATHER WEAR OUT THAN RUST

coxylaad
Site Sponsor
Posts: 1211
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:30 am

Re: oversprung rear?

Post by coxylaad » Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:33 am

I get no sag from grabbing the throttle
You shouldn't get any sag from grabbing the throttle and hard acceleration. The back end should actually lift up if anything.

its true :)

User avatar
trixynut
Site Sponsor
Posts: 2572
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:48 pm
Location: Leicester, England

Re: oversprung rear?

Post by trixynut » Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:07 am

Yep, general opinion is the standard trx rear shock is too hard for the bike

User avatar
dandywarhol
Site Sponsor
Posts: 1639
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: oversprung rear?

Post by dandywarhol » Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:31 am

coxylaad wrote:
I get no sag from grabbing the throttle
You shouldn't get any sag from grabbing the throttle and hard acceleration. The back end should actually lift up if anything.

its true :)
Is the gearbox sporcket higher than the wingarm pivot coxxy?
1996 TRX 850, blue, Ohlins 46HRCLS, Race Tech Gold Valves, 0.90 springs, Venom pipes, R6 brakes............
1974 Yamaha RD250A, Candy Blue
1998 Yamaha SZR660, blue of course
1967 Yamaha TD1C 250, Blue and white

coxylaad
Site Sponsor
Posts: 1211
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:30 am

Re: oversprung rear?

Post by coxylaad » Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:56 pm

Thats a good point. although I am fairly certain most bikes are designed that way. plus its not so much whether the sprocket is higher, it also depends on the natural angle of the swingarm. it can be higher and still have the same effect yes?

User avatar
dandywarhol
Site Sponsor
Posts: 1639
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: oversprung rear?

Post by dandywarhol » Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:54 pm

If the s/arm pivot is lower than the g/box sprocket centre then under acceleration the taught chain will try to bring the s/arm up and effectively make the bike squat for better grip. Old Be-ems did the opposite - the rear end jacked up under acceleration but as there wasn't much power it didn't really have much effect.
1996 TRX 850, blue, Ohlins 46HRCLS, Race Tech Gold Valves, 0.90 springs, Venom pipes, R6 brakes............
1974 Yamaha RD250A, Candy Blue
1998 Yamaha SZR660, blue of course
1967 Yamaha TD1C 250, Blue and white

User avatar
Kayla
Site Sponsor
Posts: 1670
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:49 am
Location: County Durham

Re: oversprung rear?

Post by Kayla » Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:01 pm

The TRX linkage/bell crank is different to the 4JH linkage. Does your bike have shorter dogbones fitted to raise the rear?

Most (all?) bikes have an element of anti-squat built in to the geometry- as the bike accelerates the chain will tend to pull the swingarm down which is what counteracts the 'squat' felt (which is actually weight transfer from front to rear, not the action of the chain on the rear sprocket).

If you have too-short dogbones fitted, the action of the rear wheel trying to move through its arc will tend to pull the linkage through its length (ie front to rear) rather than transmit the load through the shock. The shock will 'feel' stiffer because you need a larger force than standard to provide the necessary component 'up' through the shock to get it to deflect.
Image

Just because you're breathing, it doesn't mean you're alive.

coxylaad
Site Sponsor
Posts: 1211
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:30 am

Re: oversprung rear?

Post by coxylaad » Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:56 pm

what she said :lol:

User avatar
dandywarhol
Site Sponsor
Posts: 1639
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: oversprung rear?

Post by dandywarhol » Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:28 pm

Maybe I didn't explain too well - i didn't mean to imply the chain actually pull the back into a squat. I was trying to explain how the position of the swing arm pivot relative to the gearbox output shaft will have an effect on the bikes geometry under acceleration.
Wot she said ;-)
1996 TRX 850, blue, Ohlins 46HRCLS, Race Tech Gold Valves, 0.90 springs, Venom pipes, R6 brakes............
1974 Yamaha RD250A, Candy Blue
1998 Yamaha SZR660, blue of course
1967 Yamaha TD1C 250, Blue and white

User avatar
cal
TRX-Enthusiast
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:46 pm
Location: York
Contact:

Re: oversprung rear?

Post by cal » Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:40 pm

sounds like you have problems with both shocks :? , are you sure the shock is the problem, are all the linkages and whatnot moving through their range nice and free (without any shocky in place)
Cal

User avatar
xxr55
TRX-Enthusiast
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:31 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: oversprung rear?

Post by xxr55 » Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:56 pm

cobbadiggabuddyblooo wrote:the std TRX spring rate is suited for a 76kg rider but the weight of a TRX is around the 207kg mark std..
No wonder I've always enjoyed the TRX ride. I weigh 76kg. How lucky. 8)

coxylaad
Site Sponsor
Posts: 1211
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:30 am

Re: oversprung rear?

Post by coxylaad » Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:28 pm

dandywarhol wrote:Maybe I didn't explain too well - i didn't mean to imply the chain actually pull the back into a squat. I was trying to explain how the position of the swing arm pivot relative to the gearbox output shaft will have an effect on the bikes geometry under acceleration.
Wot she said ;-)
Yeah I think thats what I said :D

Post Reply